4.5 Article

Prenatal lipopolysaccharide treatment enhances MK-801-induced psychotomimetic effects in rats

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 241-249

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.12.026

关键词

Neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia; Prepulse inhibition; Locomotor activity; MK-801

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of prenatal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment, which is an animal developmental model of schizophrenia, on MK-801-induced psychotomimetic behavioral changes and brain aminergic system activity in adult offspring. Repeated LPS (1 mg/kg) injection in rats, that had started from 7th day of pregnancy and was continued every second day till delivery, resulted in a long-lasting disruption of prepulse inhibition (PPI) and elevation of locomotor activity in their offspring. The prenatally LPS-treated rats showed hypersensitivity to MK-801 (0.1 and 0.4 mg/kg) as evidenced by the enhancement of acoustic startle amplitude, reduced PPI, and enhanced locomotor activity. These behavioral changes were accompanied by a decrease in the dopamine and its metabolite, DOPAC concentration in the frontal cortex, enhanced dopaminergic system activity in the striatum and no changes in noradrenaline (NA) level. Furthermore, the significant augmentation of 5-HT and 5-HIAA content in the frontal cortex of females only was detected. No changes in the cortical NA tissue level were found. Summing up, the present study demonstrated that the activation of the immune system in prenatal period led to persistent behavioral hypersensitivity to psychotomimetic action of a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, and attention/information processing deficits. The foregoing data indicate that prenatal administration of LPS model some of the clinical aspects of schizophrenia and these behavioral effects are connected with neurochemical changes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据