4.5 Article

Baicalein is neuroprotective in rat MCAO model: Role of 12/15-lipoxygenase, mitogen-activated protein kinase and cytosolic phospholipase A2

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 96, 期 4, 页码 469-475

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.07.007

关键词

Baicalein; Cerebral ischemia; Neuroprotection; Lipoxygenase; Mitogen-activated protein kinase; Phospholipase A2

资金

  1. Hebei Province [C2010000564, 10276104D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammatory damage and oxidative stress play an important role in cerebral ischemic pathogenesis and may represent a target for treatment. Baicalein, isolated from the traditional Chinese herbal medicine Huangqin, is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent on one hand and a lipoxygenase inhibitor on the other hand. However, little is known regarding the mechanism of baicalein's neuroprotection in ischemic stroke. We therefore investigated the potential neuroprotective effects of baicalein and explored the underlying mechanisms. Male, Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and baicalein was administered intravenously immediately after cerebral ischemia. At 24 h after MCAO neurological deficit, brain water content and infarct sizes were measured. Immunohistochemistry, western blot and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were used to analyse the expression of 12/15-lipoxygenase (12/15-LOX), p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) and cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPIA2) at gene and protein levels in ischemic brain cortex. The results showed that baicalein improved neurological deficit, reduced brain water content and infarct sizes, and downregulated the overexpression of 12/15-LOX, p38 MAPK and cPLA2 typically seen with MCAO. The results indicated that baicalein protected the brain from damage caused by MCAO, and this effect may be through downregulation of 12/15-LOX, p38 MAPK and cPLA2 expression. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据