4.5 Article

MK-801 produces a deficit in sucrose preference that is reversed by clozapine, D-serine, and the metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor positive allosteric modulator CDPPB: Relevance to negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia?

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 95, 期 2, 页码 223-229

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.01.010

关键词

Anhedonia; Negative symptoms; NMDA; Metabotropic glutamate receptor; Schizophrenia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently prescribed antipsychotics attenuate the positive symptoms of schizophrenia but fail or only mildly improve negative symptoms. The present study aimed to establish an animal model of negative symptoms by examining the effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 on sucrose preference. We sought to validate the model by examining the effects of clozapine and Dserine, for which there are positive clinical data regarding their effects on negative symptoms, and haloperidol which is clinically ineffective. We extended our analysis by examining CDPPB, an mGlu5 receptor positive allosteric modulator. Acute MK-801 produced effects indicative of a shift in the hedonic experience of sucrose not confounded by disruptions in motor abilities or taste as revealed by: 1) a decrease in sucrose intake at low concentrations (0.8% or 1.2%), but no effect on water, 2) an increase in consumption for higher (7%) sucrose concentrations, reflecting a shift to the right in the concentration-consumption curve, and 3) no effect on quinine intake. Sub-chronic clozapine and acute Dserine attenuated the MK-801-induced deficit in 1.2% sucrose consumption, whereas sub-chronic haloperidol (0.02 mg/kg) did not. Finally, acute treatment with CDPPB also attenuated this deficit. These data suggest that this model may be useful for identifying novel agents that improve negative symptoms, and that compounds which enhance NMDA receptor function, such as mGlu5 receptor PAMs, may have clinical utility in this regard. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据