4.5 Article

Long-lasting decreases in cocaine-reinforced behavior following treatment with the cholinesterase inhibitor tacrine in rats selectively bred for drug self-administration

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 94, 期 1, 页码 169-178

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.08.004

关键词

Acetylcholine; Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; Cocaine; Self-administration; Reinforcement (Psychology); Tacrine

资金

  1. Office of Research and Development, Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tacrine is a centrally acting, reversible cholinesterase inhibitor that increases synaptic levels of acetylcholine (ACh) and can potentiate the actions of dopamine (DA). The present study was conducted to evaluate effects of tacrine on cocaine-rein forced responding in a rat line selectively bred for high levels of drug self-administration (the HS line). HS rats self-administered different doses of cocaine under a fixed-ratio-5 (FR-5) schedule. Over a four-day period, vehicle or tacrine (1.0, 3.2, or 10 mg/kg-day) was infused when animals were maintained in home cages (21 h per day). Tacrine dose-dependently decreased cocaine self-administration. Actions of tacrine differed for self-administration that was initiated within 20 min of pretreatment (described as early sessions), and for self-administration that occurred between one and three days after administration of tacrine was discontinued (late sessions). Tacrine's potency for attenuating self-administration during late sessions was greater for cocaine-relative to food-reinforcement in HS rats, and for HS relative to outbred rats. In a subset of tacrine-treated HS rats, cocaine self-administration was persistently attenuated by more than 80% from pretreatment baseline levels over a one-week period during which no further tacrine was administered. In summary, pretreatment with tacrine can produce a long-lasting attenuation of cocaine-rein forced responding. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据