4.4 Review

Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes in the Lower Urinary Tract

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY
卷 83, 期 5, 页码 259-269

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000209255

关键词

Muscarinic receptor subtypes; Lower urinary tract; Physiology; Pathophysiology; Anticholinergic drugs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acetylcholine acting on muscarinic M-3 receptors on the detrusor muscle is the principal stimulus for inducing the contractile response for urinary bladder voiding. The urinary bladder expresses, however, all cloned muscarinic receptor subtypes (M-1-M-5). In terms of quantity, the M-2 subtype dominates over the M-3 subtype in the detrusor, and its role in contraction seems to be primarily indirect, by blocking stimuli from cAMP-coupled receptors that induce relaxation. The excitatory M-1 and inhibitory M-2 and/or M-4 subtypes are also expressed prejunctionally. Muscarinic M-1 and M-2/M-4 autoreceptors facilitate and inhibit, respectively, the release of acetylcholine. The urothelium had been considered to be a passive barrier; however, during the last decade, it has been shown that the urothelium is of importance for bladder function. In a state of bladder pathology, muscarinic receptor changes occur in the detrusor, prejunctionally, and in the urothelium, but the character of the change differs between disorders. The urothelium expresses all subtypes of muscarinic receptors, and upon stimulation it releases factors affecting bladder afferents and smooth muscle. During inflammation, the expression of muscarinic M-5 receptors is increased, particularly in the urothelium, together with a cholinergic-induced production of nitric oxide in the mucosa. The present review describes signalling mechanisms, expression and functional effects of muscarinic receptors in the lower urinary tract. Their roles in physiological and pathophysiological conditions, as well as clinical implications of the occurrence of different muscarinic receptors, are discussed. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据