4.6 Review

Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Mediated Long-Term Depression: Molecular Mechanisms

期刊

PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 395-412

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/pr.109.001735

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council UK [80049, 57294]
  2. Biological Sciences Research Council UK [BB/F011326/1]
  3. Medical Research Council
  4. BBSRC [BB/F011326/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G0601509] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F011326/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0601509] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to modify synaptic transmission between neurons is a fundamental process of the nervous system that is involved in development, learning, and disease. Thus, synaptic plasticity is the ability to bidirectionally modify transmission, where long-term potentiation and long-term depression (LTD) represent the best characterized forms of plasticity. In the hippocampus, two main forms of LTD coexist that are mediated by activation of either N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors (NMDARs) or metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Compared with NMDAR-LTD, mGluR-LTD is less well understood, but recent advances have started to delineate the underlying mechanisms. mGluR-LTD at CA3:CA1 synapses in the hippocampus can be induced either by synaptic stimulation or by bath application of the group I selective agonist (R, S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine. Multiple signaling mechanisms have been implicated in mGluR-LTD, illustrating the complexity of this form of plasticity. This review provides an overview of recent studies investigating the molecular mechanisms underlying hippocampal mGluR-LTD. It highlights the role of key molecular components and signaling pathways that are involved in the induction and expression of mGluR-LTD and considers how the different signaling pathways may work together to elicit a persistent reduction in synaptic transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据