4.4 Article

Biological approach of anticancer activity of new benzimidazole derivatives

期刊

PHARMACOLOGICAL REPORTS
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 100-106

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharep.2014.01.001

关键词

Anticancer activity; Benzmidazole; Bioreductive prodrugs; Hypoxia; Nitrobenzimidazole

资金

  1. Medical University of Loa, Poland [503-3015-1, 507-13-052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A series of new benzimidazole derivatives, earlier synthesized, was tested in vitro as new bioreductive prodrugs with the potential anticancer activity. Their effect on the DNA destruction and growth inhibition into selected tumor cell lines at normoxia and hypoxia conditions was determined. Methods: The human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cell line was used to determine the anticancer activity of the analyzed compounds by using WST-1 assay. The apoptosis test (caspase 3/7 assay) was used to define the cytotoxic way of tumor cells death. Additionally test In situ DNA Damage Assay Kit was applied to recognize the DNA destruction. Results: Four of the examined compounds (1, 3, 7, 9) show a very good antiproliferative effect and three of them are specific for hypoxia conditions (2, 4, 8). Conclusion: Compound 8 is the most cytotoxic against human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells at hypoxic conditions. Hypoxia/normoxia cytotoxic coefficient of compound 8 (4.75) is close to hypoxia/normoxia cytotoxic coefficient of tirapazamine (5.59) - reference substance in our experiments and this parameter locates it between mitomycin C and 2-nitroimidazole (misonidazole). The screening test of the caspase-dependent apoptosis proved that the exposure of compounds 1-2 and 7-8 against A549 cells for a 48 h promote apoptotic cell death. Additionally, the test of the DNA damage established that compounds 1, 2, 7, 8 are specific agents for the hypoxia-selective cytotoxicity of nitrobenzimidazoles [6,26]. (C) 2014 Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据