4.1 Article

MEK-dependent IL-8 induction regulates the invasiveness of triple-negative breast cancer cells

期刊

TUMOR BIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 4991-4999

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-4345-7

关键词

IL-8; Poor prognosis; Cell invasion; MEK; Triple-negative breast cancer

类别

资金

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI14C3418]
  3. Samsung Biomedical Research Institute [SMX1131701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interleukin-8 (IL-8) serves as a prognostic marker for breast cancer, and its expression level correlates with metastatic breast cancer and poor prognosis. Here, we investigated the levels of IL-8 expression in a variety of breast cancer cells and the regulatory mechanism of IL-8 in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. Our results showed that IL-8 expression correlated positively with overall survival in basal-type breast cancer patients. The levels of IL-8 mRNA expression and protein secretion were significantly increased in TNBC cells compared with non-TNBC cells. In addition, the invasiveness of the TNBC cells was dramatically increased by IL-8 treatment and then augmented invasion-related proteins such as matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 or MMP-9. We observed that elevated IL-8 mRNA expression and protein secretion were suppressed by a specific MEK1/2 inhibitor, UO126. In contrast, the overexpression of constitutively active MEK significantly increased the level of IL-8 mRNA expression in BT474 non-TNBC cells. Finally, we investigated the effect of UO126 on the tumorigenecity of TNBC cells. Our results showed that anchorage-independent growth, cell invasion, and cell migration were also decreased by UO126 in TNBC cells. As such, we demonstrated that IL-8 expression is regulated through MEK/ERK-dependent pathways in TNBC cells. A diversity of MEK blockers, including UO126, may be promising for treating TNBC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据