4.2 Article

Pharmacogenomics in colorectal cancer: a genome-wide association study to predict toxicity after 5-fluorouracil or FOLFOX administration

期刊

PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 209-217

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2012.2

关键词

ADR; colorectal cancer; FOLFOX; GWAS; 5-fluorouracil

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitatia/FEDER [06/1384, CP06/0267, 06/1712, 08/0024, 08/1276, PI08-1359, PI08-1635, PS09/02368]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Accion Transversal de Cancer)
  3. Xunta de Galicia [PGIDT08CSA005208PR, PGIDIT07P-XIB9101209PR]
  4. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [SAF 07-64873, SAF 2010-19273]
  5. Fundacion Privada Olga Torres
  6. Fundacion Barrie de la Maza (Programa DIANA)
  7. Asociacion Espanola contra el Cancer (Fundacion Cientifica y Junta de Barcelona)
  8. Fundacion Mutua Madrilena (LFLA)
  9. Fundacion Ramon Areces (LFLA)
  10. Agencia d'Informacio Avaluacioi Qualitat en Salut [209/12/2009]
  11. FP7 CHIBCHA Consortium
  12. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  13. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [PS09/02368, CP 03-0070]
  14. Wellcome Trust [075491/Z/04]
  15. Cancer Research UK [16459] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of genotyping technologies has allowed for wider screening for inherited causes of variable outcomes following drug administration. We have performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on 221 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients that had been treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), either alone or in combination with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). A validation set of 791 patients was also studied. Seven SNPs (rs16857540, rs2465403, rs10876844, rs10784749, rs17626122, rs7325568 and rs4243761) showed evidence of association (pooled P-values 0.020, 9.426E-03, 0.010, 0.017, 0.042, 2.302E-04, 2.803E-03) with adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This is the first study to explore the genetic basis of inter-individual variation in toxicity responses to the administration of 5-FU or FOLFOX in CRC patients on a genome-wide scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据