4.0 Article

Histochemical Analysis of Laminin a Chains in Diethylstilbestrol-Induced Prolactinoma in Rats

期刊

ACTA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOCHEMICA
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 69-73

出版社

JAPAN SOC HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1267/ahc.14067

关键词

anterior pituitary; laminin; prolactinoma; diethylstilbestrol; rat

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [22590192, 23790233, 25860147]
  2. promotional funds for the Keirin Race of the Japan Keirin Association
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23790233, 25860147] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laminin, a major basement membrane component, is important in structural support and cell proliferation and differentiation. Its 19 isoforms are assemblies of alpha, beta, and gamma chains, and the alpha chains (alpha 1-5) determine the isoform characteristics. Although our previous studies showed alterations in alpha chain expressions during anterior pituitary development, their expressions in pituitary tumors yet to be determined. The present study used a rat model of diethylstilbestrol (DES)-induced prolactinoma to examine alpha chain expressions during prolactinoma tumorigenesis (0-12 weeks of DES treatment) by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. mRNA of alpha 1, alpha 3, and alpha 4 chains was detected in control and after 4 weeks of DES treatment. These expressions were undetectable after 8 weeks of DES treatment and in prolactinoma (12 weeks of DES treatment). Immunohistochemistry showed that the alpha 1 chain was localized in some anterior pituitary cells in control and after 4 weeks of treatment and in endothelial cells after 8 weeks of treatment. The alpha 3 and alpha 4 chains were expressed in endothelial cells, and immunoreactivity and the number of immunopositive cells decreased during DES treatment. These findings suggest that alteration of laminin alpha chains is related to abnormal cell proliferation and neovascularization during development of DES-induced prolactinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据