4.2 Review

IFN-β pharmacogenomics in multiple sclerosis

期刊

PHARMACOGENOMICS
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 1137-1148

出版社

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/PGS.10.108

关键词

IFN-beta; multiple sclerosis; pharmacogenomics; polymorphic; transcriptomics; type I interferon

资金

  1. European Community [212877]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a condition of the CNS marked by inflammation and neurodegeneration. Interferon (IFN)-beta was the first, and still is the main, immunomodulatory treatment for MS. Its clinical efficacy is limited, and a proportion of patients, ranging between 20-55%, do not respond to the therapy. Identification and subsequently, implementation in the clinic of biomarkers predictive for individual therapeutic response would facilitate improved patient care in addition to ensuring a more rational provision of this therapy. In this article, we summarize the main findings from studies addressing the pharmacogenomics of clinical response to IFN-beta in MS by either whole-genome association scans, candidate gene or transcriptomics studies. Whole-genome DNA association screens have revealed a high representation of brain-specific genes, and have hinted toward both extracellular ligand-gated ion channels and type I IFNs pathway genes as important categories of genetic IFN-beta response modifiers. One hit, glypican 5 (GPC5), was recently replicated in an independent study of IFN-beta responsiveness. Recent RNA transcriptomics studies have revealed the occurrence of a pre-existing type I IFN gene-expression signature, composed of genes that are predominantly induced by type I IFNs, as a potential contributing feature of poor response to therapy. Thus, while the outlines of a complex polygenic mechanism are gradually being uncovered, the main challenges for the near future will reside in the robust validation of identified response-modifying genes as well as in the decipherment of the mechanistic relationships between these genes and clinical response to IFN-beta.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据