4.2 Article

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study

期刊

PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 111-118

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1002/pds.2057

关键词

bone morphogenetic proteins; pancreatic cancer; cohort studies; Medicare

资金

  1. Wyeth Phamaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To assess whether use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) during lumbar spinal fusion surgery affects subsequent risk of pancreatic cancer. Methods Using US Medicare claims data, we performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion surgery between October 2003 and December 2005. The study population, all > 66 years, was identified from procedure codes for lumbar fusion. Claims for a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) served as a proxy for rhBMP-2 exposure (another BMP product shared the same code). Pancreatic cancer was identified from claims indicating this diagnosis and cancer-specific therapy. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%CIs. Results Of the 93 654 patients in the study, the mean age was 75 years, and 16.5% had claims for BMP. During a mean 1.4 years of follow-up, 91 patients were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (eight in the BMP- and 83 in the non-BMP cohort). Consistent with previous research, pancreatic cancer was associated with older age, male gender, black race, and diabetes mellitus. Compared to those who did not receive BMP, patients exposed to BMP were not at increased risk of pancreatic cancer (adjusted HR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.34-1.45). A chart review substudy validated the exposure measure; 52/55 patients with claims for BMP received rhBMP-2. Conclusions In this large study of elderly patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery, exposure to BMP was not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据