4.5 Article

Laronidase-Functionalized Multiple-Wall Lipid-Core Nanocapsules: Promising Formulation for a More Effective Treatment of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 941-954

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-014-1508-y

关键词

enzyme replacement therapy; laronidase; mucopolysaccharidosis I; multiple-wall lipid-core nanocapsules; surface functionalization

资金

  1. Fundo de Incentivo a Pesquisa (FIPE-HCPA)
  2. PRONEX and PRONEM FAPERGS/CNPq
  3. INCT-if CNPq
  4. Universal CNPq
  5. FAPERGS
  6. Rede Nanobiotec CAPES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mucopolysaccharidosis I is a genetic disorder caused by alpha-L-iduronidase deficiency. Its primary treatment is enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), which has limitations such as a high cost and a need for repeated infusions over the patient's lifetime. Considering that nanotechnological approaches may enhance enzyme delivery to organs and can reduce the dosage thereby enhancing ERT efficiency and/or reducing its cost, we synthesized laronidase surface-functionalized lipid-core nanocapsules (L-MLNC). L-MLNCs were synthesized by using a metal complex. Size distributions were evaluated by laser diffraction and dynamic light scattering. The kinetic properties, cytotoxicity, cell uptake mechanisms, clearance profile and biodistribution were evaluated. Size distributions showed a D[4,3] of 134 nm and a z-average diameter of 71 nm. L-MLNC enhanced the Vmax and Kcat in comparison with laronidase. L-MLNC is not cytotoxic, and nanocapsule uptake by active transport is not only mediated by mannose-6-phosphate receptors. The clearance profile is better for L-MLNC than for laronidase. A biodistribution analysis showed enhanced enzyme activity in different organs within 4 h and 24 h for L-MLNC. The use of lipid-core nanocapsules as building blocks to synthesize surface-functionalized nanocapsules represents a new platform for producing decorated soft nanoparticles that are able to modify drug biodistribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据