4.1 Article

Facial lymph node involvement as a prognostic factor for patient survival in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

TUMOR BIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 3489-3496

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-4188-2

关键词

Facial lymph node; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Neck dissection; Surgery; Postoperative radiotherapy

类别

资金

  1. Science & Technology support program from Hunan Provincial Science & Technology Department [2013SK3204]
  2. Health Department of Hunan Province [B2013-091]
  3. Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars from Hunan Cancer Hospital [A2011-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the incidence of metastasis to facial lymph nodes (FLNs) and to determine its impact on the prognosis and survival of patients at onset of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A retrospective review of 641 patients with OSCC treated with curative surgery (CS) alone or CS + postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) was performed. Based on FLN status, an analysis of clinicopathologic parameters, prognosis, and survival was conducted. By classifying patients according to FLN status, a reasonable treatment modality was identified in the low-risk group, which was defined as those who had N0-1 disease, negative margin, and no extracapsular nodal spread (ENS). FLN involvement was identified in 103 patients (16 %), which showed statistically significant associations with several established risk factors and negatively affected local controls (P < 0.001), neck controls (P < 0.001), and disease-specific survival (P < 0.001). Compared to CS alone, CS + PORT increased the 5-year neck control rate (76.8 vs. 30.7 %, P = 0.006) and disease-specific survival rate (67.8 vs. 30.7 %, P = 0.037) of the OSCC patients with FLN metastasis in the low-risk group. Metastasis to FLNs is strongly associated with poor disease control and lower survival rate of OSCC patients. PORT minimized the residual risk of involved FLN in the low-risk group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据