4.5 Article

Albumin-Coated Porous Hollow Poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid) Microparticles Bound with Palmityl-Acylated Exendin-4 as a Long-Acting Inhalation Delivery System for the Treatment of Diabetes

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 2008-2019

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-011-0427-4

关键词

albumin-binding; albumin-coating; inhalation; palmityl-acylated exendin-4; porous microspheres

资金

  1. Ministry for Health, Welfare Family Affairs [A092018]
  2. Korean government (MEST) [2010-0028167]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study the development of porous poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microparticles (PLGA MPs) coated initially with albumin and then with palmityl-acylated exendin-4 (Pal-Ex4) as an inhalation system for treating diabetes. Porous PLGA MPs were prepared by w/o/w double emulsification using hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin and poly(ethylene-alt-maleic anhydride). Albumin was covalently attached to the MPs using EDC (1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide); Pal-Ex4 was then bound on the albumin surface. Albumin-binding degree and aerosolization efficiency were investigated. Deposition of the MPs after insufflations into the lungs of ICR mice was observed by image monitoring, and pulmonary hypoglycemic efficacies were examined in db/db mice. Cytotoxicity and histopathology induced by MPs were examined in Calu-3 and A549 cells and in the lungs of db/db mice, respectively. Albumin-coating and Pal-Ex4-binding to porous MP were performed with acceptable efficiencies. Pal-Ex4-bound albumin-coated MPs (Pal-Ex4/HSA-PLGA MP) were of high porosity and had appropriate aerodynamic sizes. Furthermore, this MP was efficiently deposited throughout mouse lungs, and exhibited a prolonged hypoglycemia and no significant lung tissue damage in db/db mice. Pal-Ex4/HSA-PLGA MP demonstrated many meaningful pharmaceutical advantages for the treatment of diabetes, in terms of aerosolization efficiency, drug loading, sustained drug-release, and hypoglycemic duration in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据