4.1 Article

MicroRNA-15a-5p suppresses cancer proliferation and division in human hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting BDNF

期刊

TUMOR BIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 5821-5828

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-4427-6

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; miR-15a-5p; BDNF; Cancer proliferation; Cell cycle

类别

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2013B021800284]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272312, 81300421]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the expression pattern and functional roles of microRNA 15a-5p (miR-15a-5p) in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Possible miR-15a-5p aberrant expression in HCC cell lines or clinical HCC specimens was examined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). In HCC HepG2 and SNU-182 cells, miR-15a-5p was ectopically overexpressed by lentiviral transduction. Its effect on HCC proliferation, cancer division, and in vivo tumor growth were examined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, cell cycle assay, and tumorigenicity assay, respectively. The targeting of miR-15a-5p on its downstream gene, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), was examined by dual-luciferase assay, qRT-PCR, and Western blot, respectively. BDNF was then overexpressed in HepG2 and SNU-182 cells to evaluate its selective effect on miR-15a-5p in HCC modulation. MiR-15a-5p is aberrantly downregulated in in vitro HCC cell lines and in vivo HCC clinical specimens. Ectopic overexpression of miR-15a-5p suppressed cancer proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest in HepG2 or SNU-182 cells in vitro, and inhibited HCC tumor growth in vivo. MiR-15a-5p selectively and negatively regulated BDNF at both gene and protein levels in HCC cells. Forced overexpression of BDNF effectively reversed the tumor suppressive functions of miR-15a-5p on HCC proliferation and cell division in vitro. Our study demonstrated that miR-15a-5p is a tumor suppressor in HCC and its regulation is through BDNF in HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据