4.6 Article

Triptolide modulates the sensitivity of K562/A02 cells to adriamycin by regulating miR-21 expression

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGY
卷 50, 期 10, 页码 1233-1240

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/13880209.2012.665931

关键词

Triptolide; multidrug resistance; apoptosis; PTEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Multidrug-resistance is a serious obstacle encountered in leukemia treatment. Recent studies have shown microRNA-21 (miR-21) is overexpressed in several types of cancer and contributes to tumor resistance to chemotherapy. In our previous studies, we found triptolide (TPL) could enhance adriamycin-induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis in K562/A02 cells. Objective: In the present study, we investigated the mechanism of TPL on the sensitivity of K562/A02 cells to adriamycin. Materials and methods: Cell viability was assessed by methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay. Expression of mature miR-21 was determined by SYBER green PCR. The miR-21 mimics and inhibitors were chemically synthesized and transfected into K562 cells or K562/A02 cells. PTEN protein levels was determined by western blots. PTEN promoter activity was measured by luciferase assays. Results: TPL (5 nmol/L) increased the sensitivity of K562/A02 to adriamycin. When adriamycin was combined with 5 nmol/L TPL, the mean apoptotic population of K562/A02 cells was increased from 4.3 to 18.5%, respectively. K562/A02 cells showed a significant reduction in miR-21 and phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten (PTEN) expressions after TPL treatment. K562/A02 cells that were transfected with the miR-21 inhibitor had a significantly higher PTEN protein level than the control. K562 cells that were pre-treated with PTEN siRNA had increased survival rate compared to the control group. Discussion and conclusion: Our findings indicated that triptolide modulates the sensitivity of K562/A02 cells to adriamycin by regulating miR-21 expression. Triptolide inhibited miR-21 expression and enhanced PTEN levels in K562/A02 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据