4.4 Review

T-type channel-mediated neurotransmitter release

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-014-1489-z

关键词

LVA calcium channels; T-type channel-secretion coupling; Vesicle exocytosis; Neurons; Synaptic transmission; Neuroendocrine chromaffin cells

资金

  1. Italian M.I.U.R., Regione Piemonte, Universita di Torino, Compagnia di San Paolo di Torino

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Besides controlling a wide variety of cell functions, T-type channels have been shown to regulate neurotransmitter release in peripheral and central synapses and neuroendocrine cells. Growing evidence over the last 10 years suggests a key role of Cav3.2 and Cav3.1 channels in controlling basal neurosecretion near resting conditions and sustained release during mild stimulations. In some cases, the contribution of low-voltage-activated (LVA) channels is not directly evident but requires either the activation of coupled presynaptic receptors, block of ion channels, or chelation of metal ions. Concerning the coupling to the secretory machinery, T-type channels appear loosely coupled to neurotransmitter and hormone release. In neurons, Cav3.2 and Cav3.1 channels mainly control the asynchronous appearance of minis [miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) and miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs)]. The same loose coupling is evident from membrane capacity and amperometric recordings in chromaffin cells and melanotropes where the low-threshold-driven exocytosis possesses the same linear Ca2+ dependence of the other voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Cav1 and Cav2) that is strongly attenuated by slow calcium buffers. The intriguing issue is that, despite not expressing a consensus synprint site, Cav3.2 channels do interact with syntaxin 1A and SNAP-25 and, thus, may form nanodomains with secretory vesicles that can be regulated at low voltages. In this review, we discuss all the past and recent issues related to T-type channel-secretion coupling in neurons and neuroendocrine cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据