4.3 Article

Establishment of biochemistry reference values for healthy Tanzanian infants, children and adolescents in Kilimanjaro Region

期刊

TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
卷 20, 期 11, 页码 1569-1577

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12580

关键词

reference interval; biochemistry; children; paediatric; sub-Saharan Africa; Tanzania

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [U01 AI069484, P30 AI064518] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTo establish common biochemistry reference intervals for Tanzanian infants, children and adolescents living in the Kilimanjaro Region. MethodsWe recruited healthy, HIV-uninfected Tanzanian infants, children and youth between the ages of 1month and 17years from local schools and clinics to participate in this study. Only afebrile children without signs of physical or chronic illness were enrolled. Nonparametric methods were used to determine 95% reference limits and their 90% confidence intervals, with outliers removed by the Tukey method. ResultsA total of 619 healthy infants, children and adolescents were enrolled into the study. Twenty-three biochemistry parameters were measured. Compared to US reference intervals, several of the biochemistry parameters showed notable differences, namely alkaline phosphatase, phosphorus, amylase and lipase. Comparing our data to the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Division of AIDS (DAIDS) grading criteria for classification of adverse events, we found that for selected parameters, up to 15% of infants or children in certain age groups would have been categorised as having an adverse event as defined by DAIDS. ConclusionsOur study further confirms the need to use locally established reference intervals to define reference laboratory parameters among children in Africa, rather than relying on those derived from US or European populations. To our knowledge, this study provides the first set of locally validated biochemistry reference ranges for a paediatric population in Tanzania.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据