4.4 Article

Kv3.4 potassium channel-mediated electrosignaling controls cell cycle and survival of irradiated leukemia cells

期刊

PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY
卷 465, 期 8, 页码 1209-1221

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-013-1249-5

关键词

K562 human erythroid leukemia cells; Primary chronic myeloid leukemia cells; Patch-clamp whole-cell recording; Ion channels; Calcium signaling; Cell cycle

资金

  1. Wilhelm-Sander-Stiftung
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [2011.083.1, RU 1641/1-1]
  3. DFG International Graduate School 1302 [TP T9, T1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant ion channel expression in the plasma membrane is characteristic for many tumor entities and has been attributed to neoplastic transformation, tumor progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance. The present study aimed to define the function of these oncogenic channels for radioresistance of leukemia cells. Chronic myeloid leukemia cells were irradiated (0-6 Gy X ray), ion channel expression and activity, Ca2+- and protein signaling, cell cycle progression, and cell survival were assessed by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, patch-clamp recording, fura-2 Ca2+-imaging, immunoblotting, flow cytometry, and clonogenic survival assays, respectively. Ionizing radiation-induced G(2)/M arrest was preceded by activation of K(v)3.4-like voltage-gated potassium channels. Channel activation in turn resulted in enhanced Ca2+ entry and subsequent activation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase-II, and inactivation of the phosphatase cdc25B and the cyclin-dependent kinase cdc2. Accordingly, channel inhibition by tetraethylammonium and blood-depressing substance-1 and substance-2 or downregulation by RNA interference led to release from radiation-induced G(2)/M arrest, increased apoptosis, and decreased clonogenic survival. Together, these findings indicate the functional significance of voltage-gated K+ channels for the radioresistance of myeloid leukemia cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据