4.4 Article

Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle fibers from adult domestic honeybee

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-009-0642-6

关键词

Excitation-contraction coupling; Patch-clamp; Ryanodine; Insect; Insecticide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excitation-contraction coupling was characterized in enzymatically isolated adult honeybee skeletal muscle fibers. The voltage-dependent Ca(2+) current (I (Ca)) underlies action potential (AP) depolarization phase in honeybee muscle. A single AP leads to rapid and transient cytoplasmic Ca(2+) increase (Ca(2+) transient), which afterwards returns toward baseline following an exponential time course. Trains of APs elicit a staircase increase of Ca(2+), as a result of multiple Ca(2+) transient summation. Surprisingly, the nifedipine-sensitive I (Ca) is blocked by allethrin, a pyrethroid insecticide, revealing myotoxic effects of this neurotoxic insecticide for honeybees. Ca(2+) transients are under the control of Ca(2+) entry through voltage-activated Ca(2+) channels. Indeed, Ca(2+) transient amplitude depends on extracellular Ca(2+) concentration, and bell-shaped relationships are obtained for both I (Ca) integral and the Ca(2+) transient peak in response to depolarizations of increasing amplitude. The slow inactivation kinetics of I (Ca) induces long-lasting Ca(2+) transients that tend to reach a plateau and to return toward a resting level after the end of the stimulation. A Ca(2+)-induced Ca(2+) release mechanism is suggested by two results. First, caffeine (a parts per thousand yen5 mM) and 4-cmc (> 0.4 mM), two activators of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) release channels (CRCs), induce Ca(2+) elevations in the absence of extracellular Ca(2+). Second, ryanodine (5 A mu M) a plant alkaloid that binds specifically to CRCs, depresses voltage-induced Ca(2+) transients. Honeybee muscle fibers represent a valuable model to study invertebrate excitation-contraction coupling and insecticide myotoxicity toward useful insects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据