4.7 Article

Estimating the development of the fennel aphid, Hyadaphis foeniculi (Passerini) (Hemiptera: Aphiididae), using non-linear models

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 744-751

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3845

关键词

modelling; bioecology; fennel aphid; temperature; integrated pest management

资金

  1. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Study and Project Funding Agency) (FINEP)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDNon-linear models making it possible to predict agricultural pest outbreaks and optimise control tactics are of primary importance for integrated pest management. The development period for immature stages of the fennel aphid Hyadaphis foeniculi (Passerini) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) at constant temperatures was modelled in order to determine mathematical functions for simulating the aphid's development. Non-linear models were used to describe the relationship between temperature and development rates of H. foeniculi subjected to constant temperatures. RESULTSThe models used were found to be good fits for estimating H. foeniculi development rates as a function of temperature, with the exception of the Davidson model. The development time of H. foeniculi nymphs ranged from 2.73days (first instar) to 6.18days (fourth instar) at 15 degrees C, from 2.57days (first instar) to 4.52days (fourth instar) at 20 degrees C and from 1.53days (first instar) to 2.05days (fourth instar) at 28 degrees C. CONCLUSIONThese models provide important tools for better elucidation of the relationship between temperature and development rates in H. foeniculi. The results could be used for predicting the occurrence of the various immature stages of H. foeniculi in the fennel crop in Brazil, making it possible to predict more accurately the best periods for implementing pest control. (c) 2014 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据