4.7 Review

Glyphosate resistance: state of knowledge

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 70, 期 9, 页码 1367-1377

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3743

关键词

vacuole sequestration; gene duplication; gene amplification; EPSPS (5-enolypyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase); P-31 NMR; glyphosate; restricted translocation; reduced translocation; group G herbicides; herbicide resistance

资金

  1. Bayer CropScience (Weed Resistance Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany)
  2. Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative at the University of Western Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies of mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate have increased current understanding of herbicide resistance mechanisms. Thus far, single-codon non-synonymous mutations of EPSPS (5-enolypyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase) have been rare and, relative to other herbicide mode of action target-site mutations, unconventionally weak in magnitude for resistance to glyphosate. However, it is possible that weeds will emerge with non-synonymous mutations of two codons of EPSPS to produce an enzyme endowing greater resistance to glyphosate. Today, target-gene duplication is a common glyphosate resistance mechanism and could become a fundamental process for developing any resistance trait. Based on competition and substrate selectivity studies in several species, rapid vacuole sequestration of glyphosate occurs via a transporter mechanism. Conversely, as the chloroplast requires transporters for uptake of important metabolites, transporters associated with the two plastid membranes may separately, or together, successfully block glyphosate delivery. A model based on finite glyphosate dose and limiting time required for chloroplast loading sets the stage for understanding how uniquely different mechanisms can contribute to overall glyphosate resistance. (C) 2014 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据