4.7 Article

Dietary chlorantraniliprole suppresses reproduction in worker bumblebees

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 69, 期 7, 页码 787-791

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3504

关键词

bumblebee; Bombus terrestris; chlorantraniliprole; Coragen (R); lethargic behaviour

资金

  1. Fund of Scientific Research (FWO-Vlaanderen, Belgium)
  2. Special Research Fund of Ghent University (BOF-UGent)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Pollinators such as the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, fulfil a crucial role in agriculture. In this context, tests were conducted with the insecticide chlorantraniliprole (Coragen (R)) as a model compound active on the ryanodine receptor of insects. RESULTS Chronic oral exposure via pollen induced lethargic behaviour in B. terrestris workers and their offspring (drones). Indeed, in nests exposed to 0.4mgL-1, representing 1/100 of the concentration recommended for use in the field, workers and drones did not take their defensive position upon stimulation and they were less active than non-exposed insects. The different risk assessment tests used here demonstrated that contact and pollen exposure had no effect on bumblebee worker survival, whereas oral exposure via sugar water caused both acute (72h LC50=13mgL-1) and chronic (7week LC50=7mgL-1) toxicity. Severe sublethal effects on reproduction were recorded in nests orally exposed to pollen treated with chlorantraniliprole. CONCLUSION The present study identified an important physiological endpoint of sublethal effects on reproduction, as this is associated with lethargic behaviour after oral intake. As such, this is a factor that should now be incorporated into future risk assessments. Secondly, it confirmed that the assessment of sublethal effects on behaviour is needed for adequate risk assessment of potentially deleterious' compounds with a neurogenic target, as is also pointed out in the recent European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidelines. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据