4.7 Article

Incorporating natural enemy units into a dynamic action threshold for the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines ( Homoptera: Aphididae)

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 70, 期 6, 页码 879-888

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3674

关键词

biological control; natural enemies; natural enemy units; predation; parasitism

资金

  1. Pesticide Risk Reduction Program of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  2. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs - University of Guelph Sustainable Production Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDRecommended action thresholds for soybean aphid, Aphis glycines, do not adjust for natural enemy impact, although natural enemies contribute important biological control services. Because individual natural enemy species have varied impacts on pest population dynamics, incorporating the impact of a diverse predator guild into an action threshold can be cumbersome. RESULTSField surveys identified an aphidophagous natural enemy complex dominated by Orius insidiosus, Coccinella septempunctata, Harmonia axyridis and Aphelinus certus. Functional responses of O. insidiosus were determined in the laboratory, while predation rates of all other natural enemies were obtained from the literature. Natural enemy impacts were normalized using natural enemy units (NEUs), where 1 NEU = 100 aphids consumed or parasitized. A dynamic action threshold (DAT) was developed by combining NEUs with an A. glycines population growth model. With the DAT, an insecticide application was only triggered if natural enemy numbers were insufficient to suppress pest populations. In field experiments, DAT provided equivalent yields to the conventional action threshold and reduced the average number of pesticide applications. CONCLUSIONThe DAT approach has the potential to reduce pesticide use, will help preserve natural enemy populations and can be applied to other pest systems with diverse natural enemy guilds. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据