4.7 Article

Molecular bases for resistance to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitor in Japanese foxtail (Alopecurus japonicus)

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 68, 期 9, 页码 1241-1247

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3285

关键词

acetyl-CoA carboxylase; herbicide resistance; Alopecurus japonicus; haloxyfop-R-methyl; amino acid substitution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30971928]
  2. Specialised Research Fund, Doctoral Programme of Higher Education of China [20090097120046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Haloxyfop-R-methyl is a widely used herbicide to control Poaceae weeds. Alopecurus japonicus, a widespread annual grass, can no longer be controlled by haloxyfop-R-methyl after continuous use of this herbicide for several years. RESULTS: Dose-response experiments have established that the Js-R biotype of A. japonicas has evolved resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionates (APPs). Target-site enzyme sensitivity experiments have established that the haloxyfop (free acid) rate causing 50% inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) activity (I50) for the resistant (Js-R) biotype is 11 times higher than that for the susceptible (Js-S) biotype. In many cases, resistance to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides is due to a resistant ACCase enzyme. Full-length DNA and mRNA sequences of the plastidic ACCase gene were amplified. Eight single-nucleotide differences were detected in this region. Four of the nucleotide changes were silent mutations. However, the other four nucleotide mutations caused four amino acid substitutions, replacing Arg-1734 with Gly, Met-1738 with Leu, Thr-1739 with Ser and Ile-2041 with Asn in the R biotype respectively; the substitution at position 2041 had been reported, while the other three had not. CONCLUSION: The ACCase in the Js-R biotype was less susceptible to haloxyfop-R-methyl than that in the Js-S biotype. Moreover, the amino acid substitution of Ile-2041 with Asn might confer resistance to haloxyfop-R-methyl in A. japonicas. Copyright (c) 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据