4.7 Article

Synergistic and antagonistic interactions of terpenes against Meloidogyne incognita and the nematicidal activity of essential oils from seven plants indigenous to Greece

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 341-351

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ps.2070

关键词

synergistic action; Meloidogyne incognita; Pistacea terebinthus; Pimpinella anisum; gamma-eudesmol; benzaldehyde

资金

  1. Greek State Scholarships Foundation of Greece

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Biorational means for phytonematode control were studied within the context of an increasingly ecofriendly pest management global approach. The nematicidal activity and the chemical composition of essential oils (EOs) isolated from seven plants grown in Greece and ten selected compounds extracted from them against second-stage juveniles (J2) of Meloidogyne incognita (Kof. & White) Chitwood were evaluated using juvenile paralysis experiments. Additionally, synergistic and antagonistic interactions between nematicidal terpenes were studied using an effect addition model, with the comparison made at one concentration level. RESULTS: The 96 h EC50 values of Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Pimpinella anisum L., Eucalyptus meliodora A Cunn ex Schauer and Pistacia terebinthus L. were 231, 269,807 and 1116 mu g mL(-1), respectively, in an immersion bioassay. Benzaldehyde (9 mu g mL(-1)) was the most toxic compound, followed by gamma-eudesmol (50 mu g mL-1) and estragole (180 mu g mL(-1)), based on 96 h EC50 values. The most potent terpene pairs between which synergistic actions were found, in decreasing order, were: trans-anethole/geraniol, trans-anethole/eugenol, carvacrol/eugenol and geraniol/carvacrol. CONCLUSION: This is the first report on the activity of F. vulgare, P. anisum, E. meliodora and P. terebinthus, and additionally on synergistic/antagonistic nematicidal terpene interactions, against M. incognita, providing alternative methods for nematode control. (C) 2010 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据