4.7 Article

Esterase-mediated resistance to pyrethroids in field populations of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Central Africa

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 65, 期 10, 页码 1147-1154

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1807

关键词

insecticide resistance; esterase; synergist; cotton; pyrethroids; Cameroon; Helicoverpa armigera

资金

  1. IFS [C/4067-1]
  2. National Cotton Development Corporation (SODECOTON)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Evolution of pyrethroid resistance in the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) threatens continued cotton production in Central Africa. Dose-response bioassays were conducted on area-wide collection of bollworm populations from major host plants, while biochemical techniques were used to evaluate basic mechanisms underlying resistance. RESULTS: Pyrethroid resistance is primarily associated with detoxification by enhanced esterase activity. High resistance to cypermethrin (RF = 67-1771), cross-resistance to deltamethrin (RF = 60-2972) and lack of cross-resistance to the non-ester pyrethroid etofenprox (RF = 2-10) were observed among H. armigera field populations and laboratory-selected strains. Enzymatic assays showed that esterase activity, but not oxidase content or glutathione-S-transferase activity, was positively correlated with resistance to cypermethrin. Pretreatment with piperonyl butoxide (PBO) resulted in significant synergism with cypermethrin in 6/10 field populations, but not in the laboratory-selected strain, indicating that additional mechanisms such as mixed-function oxidase (MFO) may be involved in field resistance. The absence of cross-resistance to DDT ruled out a possible target-site modification. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the mechanisms involved in pyrethroid resistance and the lack of cross-resistance to spinosad and indoxacarb is a key to devising new resistance management strategies aimed at restoring the efficacy of pyrethroid-based programmes. (C) 2009 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据