4.7 Article

Effect of seven new orchard pesticides on Galendromus occidentalis in laboratory studies

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 65, 期 6, 页码 635-639

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1721

关键词

thiamethoxam; spinosad; thiacloprid; imidacloprid; acetamiprid; methoxyfenoxide; spirodiclofen; toxicity; Galendromus occidentalis

资金

  1. Pest Management Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Biological control of phytophagous mites in orchards requires that pesticides used to manage other arthropod pests or diseases are harmless to predacious mites, as these are essential to keep phytophagous mites at non-injurious population levels. This study evaluates the possible toxic attributes of acetamiprid, imidacloprid, thiacloprid, thiamethoxam, spirodiclofen, spinosad and methoxyfenoxide currently used in western Canadian orchards. RESULTS: None of these pesticides has any ovicidal properties against Galendromus occidentalis (Nesbitt). Imidacloprid and acetamiprid were highly toxic to the adults and reduced fecundity significantly. Thiamethoxam and spirodiclofen were non-toxic to adults, but they slightly reduced fecundity. Thiacloprid, spinosad and methoxyfenoxide were harmless to adults and had no effect on fecundity. All compounds showed some repellence at 24 h intervals for 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Imicacloprid and acetamiprid are incompatible with IPM programs because they are toxic to adults and negatively affect fecundity. Thiamethoxam and spirodiclofen need further field evaluation to determine if they are compatible with IPM programs because they slightly reduced fecundity. Thiacloprid, spinosad and methoxy fenoxide are harmless to adults, but they are slightly repellent. Therefore, with the exception of imicacloprid and acetamiprid, all these compounds should be field tested for compatibility in an IPM program. (c) Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据