4.4 Article

Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform

期刊

TRIALS
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0776-0

关键词

Randomised controlled trials; methodology; efficiency; research waste

资金

  1. Network of MRC Hubs for Trials Methodology Research
  2. Health Services Research Unit at the University of Aberdeen
  3. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates
  4. Cancer Research UK [16895] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Chief Scientist Office [NMAHP2, HSRU1, SPHSU15, SPHSU1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Marie Curie [MCCC-FCO-11-C] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0901530, 1415468, G1002325, MR/L004933/1, MR/K025635/1, MC_UU_12023/25, MC_UU_12017/4, MC_UU_12023/24, MC_UU_12017/15, MR/K023233/1, MR/K025643/1, G0800803, UD99999939] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0514-10114] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. MRC [MC_UU_12017/4, MR/L004933/1, G1002325, MR/K025635/1, MC_UU_12017/15, G0901530, MR/K025643/1, MC_UU_12023/24, MR/K023233/1, G0800803] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Randomised trials are at the heart of evidence-based healthcare, but the methods and infrastructure for conducting these sometimes complex studies are largely evidence free. Trial Forge (www.trialforge.org) is an initiative that aims to increase the evidence base for trial decision making and, in doing so, to improve trial efficiency. This paper summarises a one-day workshop held in Edinburgh on 10 July 2014 to discuss Trial Forge and how to advance this initiative. We first outline the problem of inefficiency in randomised trials and go on to describe Trial Forge. We present participants' views on the processes in the life of a randomised trial that should be covered by Trial Forge. General support existed at the workshop for the Trial Forge approach to increase the evidence base for making randomised trial decisions and for improving trial efficiency. Agreed upon key processes included choosing the right research question; logistical planning for delivery, training of staff, recruitment, and retention; data management and dissemination; and close down. The process of linking to existing initiatives where possible was considered crucial. Trial Forge will not be a guideline or a checklist but a 'go to' website for research on randomised trials methods, with a linked programme of applied methodology research, coupled to an effective evidence-dissemination process. Moreover, it will support an informal network of interested trialists who meet virtually (online) and occasionally in person to build capacity and knowledge in the design and conduct of efficient randomised trials. Some of the resources invested in randomised trials are wasted because of limited evidence upon which to base many aspects of design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials. Trial Forge will help to address this lack of evidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据