4.4 Article

Dynamic changes in dopamine neuron function after DNSP-11 treatment: Effects in vivo and increased ERK 1/2 phosphorylation in vitro

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2013.12.007

关键词

Dopamine; Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor; Parkinson's disease; Striatum; Peptide

资金

  1. National Center for Research Resources [5P20RR016481-12]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [8 P20 GM103436-12]
  3. National Center for Research Resources
  4. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  5. National Institutes of Health [UL1TR000117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has demonstrated robust effects on dopamine (DA) neuron function and survival. A post-translational processing model of the human GDNF proprotein theorizes the formation of smaller, amidated peptide(s) from the proregion that exhibit neurobiological function, including an 11-amino-acid peptide named dopamine neuron stimulating peptide-11 (DNSP-11). A single treatment of DNSP-11 was delivered to the substantia nigra in the rat to investigate effects on DA-neuron function. Four weeks after treatment, potassium (K+) and D-amphetamine evoked DA release were studied in the striatum using microdialysis. There were no significant changes in DA-release after DNSP-11 treatment determined by microdialysis. Dopamine release was further examined in discrete regions of the striatum using high-speed chronoamperometry at 1-, 2-, and 4-weeks after DNSP-11 treatment. Two weeks after DNSP-11 treatment, potassium-evoked DA release was increased in specific subregions of the striatum. However, spontaneous locomotor activity was unchanged by DNSP-11 treatment. In addition, we show that a single treatment of DNSP-11 in the MN9D dopaminergic neuronal cell line results in phosphorylation of ERK1 /2, which suggests a novel cellular mechanism responsible for increases in DA function. (c) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据