4.4 Article

Endogenous galanin as a novel biomarker to predict gestational diabetes mellitus

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 186-189

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2014.01.024

关键词

Galanin; GGT; Glucose; Gestational diabetes

资金

  1. National Natural Scientific Fund of China [81173392]
  2. National Health and Family Planning Commission of China [W201309]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although a significantly higher level of plasma galanin was found in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in our previous study, it is unknown whether plasma galanin is biomarker for the prediction of GDM. The present study aims to further evaluate the relationship between endogenous galanin and GDM in pregnant women and to find out the precise mechanism by which galanin plays role in the pathogenesis of GDM. The study registered thirty pregnant women with GDM and thirty pregnant women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Demographic and biochemical parameters and fasting venous blood samples of two groups were collected from all cases. Galanin was analyzed by an enzymelinked immunosorbent assay. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) was measured by enzymatic methods. The plasma galanin and GGT levels were found higher in GDM compared with NGT (13< 0.001). In addition, a significant positive correlation was shown between galanin and fasting glucose (13= 0.049), 1-h glucose (13= 0.033), body mass index (BMI) (P< 0.001) and GGT (13= 0.048) in pregnant women with GDM, whereas there was significant positive correlation between galanin and BMI (P=0.030) in NGT group. The plasma galanin and GGT levels are higher in patients with GDM. The plasma galanin levels appear to be related to the changes of blood glucose, BMI and GTT in GDM. The higher level of galanin observed in GDM may represent a adaptation to the rise of glucose, weight, GGT associated with GDM. The higher level of plasma galanin is a novel biomarker for the prediction of GDM. (c) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据