4.4 Article

The cardiac expression of Mas receptor is responsive to different physiological and pathological stimuli

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 196-201

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.03.022

关键词

Mas receptor; Physical training; Isoproterenol treatment; Myocardial infarction; DOCA-salt rats

资金

  1. FAPEMIG (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais)
  2. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
  3. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  4. INCT NanoBiofar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mas protooncogene encodes a G protein-coupled receptor that has been described as a functional receptor for the cardioprotective fragment of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), Angiotensin (Ang)-(1-7). The aim of this current study was to evaluate the responsiveness of Mas expression in hearts during different physiological and pathological conditions in rats. Physical training was considered a physiological condition, while isoproterenol-induced hypertrophy, myocardial infarction and DOCA-salt model of hypertension were used as pathological models of heart injury. The expression of Mas was analyzed by western blotting. Although swim-trained rats presented significant cardiac hypertrophy, our physical training protocol was unable to induce changes in the expression of Mas. On the other hand, cardiac hypertrophy and damage elicited by isoproterenol treatment led to a reduction in Mas expression. Myocardial infarction also significantly decreased the expression of Mas after 21 days of myocardial ischemia. Additionally, Mas expression levels were increased in hearts of DOCA-salt rats. Our present data indicate that Mas expression is responsive to different pathological stimuli, thereby suggesting that Mas receptor is involved in the homeostasis of the heart, as well as in the establishment and progression of cardiac diseases. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据