4.4 Article

Wound healing activity of the human antimicrobial peptide LL37

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 1469-1476

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2011.06.005

关键词

Antimicrobial peptide; LL37; Angiogenesis; Wound healing

资金

  1. Fundacaopara a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (Portugal) [SFRH/BD/27404/2006]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/27404/2006] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are part of the innate immune system and are generally defined as cationic, amphipathic peptides, with less than 50 amino acids, including multiple arginine and lysine residues. The human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide LL37 can be found at different concentrations in many different cells, tissues and body fluids and has a broad spectrum of antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities. The healing of wound is a complex process that involves different steps: hemostasis, inflammation, remodeling/granulation tissue formation and re-epithelialization. Inflammation and angiogenesis are two fundamental physiological conditions implicated in this process. We have recently developed a new method for the expression and purification of recombinant LL37. In this work, we show that the recombinant peptide P-LL37 with a N-terminus proline preserves its immunophysiological properties in vitro and in vivo. P-LL37 neutralized the activation of macrophages by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Besides, the peptide induced proliferation, migration and tubule-like structures formation by endothelial cells. Wound healing experiments were performed in dexamethasone-treated mice to study the effect of LL37 on angiogenesis and wound regeneration. The topical application of synthetic and recombinant LL37 increased vascularization and re-epithelialization. Taken together, these results clearly demonstrate that LL37 may have a key role in wound regeneration through vascularization. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据