4.4 Article

Characterization of antimicrobial peptides in skin secretions from discrete populations of Lithobates chiricahuensis (Ranidae) from central and southern Arizona

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 664-669

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2011.01.018

关键词

Frog skin; Antimicrobial peptide; Brevinin-1; Esculentin-2; Ranatuerin-2; Palustrin-2; Taxonomy

资金

  1. U.A.E. University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Populations of the Chiricahua leopard frog Litho bates chiricahuensis (Ranidae) occupying regions in southern Arizona (southern range) are morphologically distinct from those from the Mogollon Rim of central Arizona (northern range) and a comparison of DNA sequences of mitochondrial genes has suggested that they may represent separate species. Peptidomic analysis of norepinephrine-stimulated skin secretions has led to the identification of six peptides with antimicrobial activity in samples from specimens from both groups. The primary structure of the peptides (esculentin-2CHa, ranatuerin-2CHa, -CHb, and -CHc, and brevinin-1CHa and -CHb) isolated from both southern and northern range frogs are identical consistent with the proposal that the two populations are conspecific. However, palustrin-2CHa and the atypical brevinin-1CHc (FFPTIAG*****LTKLFCA ITKKC), containing a five amino acid residue deletion, were identified only in secretions from southern range specimens. Consequently, there is some support for the proposal that the two populations are closely related but separate species but this support is relatively weak. Esculentin-2CHa (GFSSIFRGVAKFASKGLG KDLAKLGVDLVACKISKQC) displayed the highest antimicrobial potency (MIC <= 10 mu M) against a variety of microorganisms and was only moderately hemolytic (LC50= 150 mu M). Cladistic analysis based upon the primary structures of brevinin-1 peptides indicates a close phylogenetic relationship between L chiricahuensis, L. onca, and L. yavapaiensis. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据