4.4 Article

Central leptin treatment modulates brain glucosensing function and peripheral energy metabolism of rainbow trout

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 1044-1054

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2010.02.026

关键词

Rainbow trout; Glucosensor; Leptin; Food intake; Hypothalamus; Hindbrain

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia and European Fund for Regional Development [AGL2007-65744-C03-01/ACU]
  2. Universidade de Vigo
  3. AECID
  4. MEC
  5. Xunta de Galicia
  6. Xunta de Galicia (Consolidacion e estructuracion de unidades de investigacion competitivas) [INCITE09ENA310002ES]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to obtain evidence for the possible modulatory effect of leptin on glucosensing capacity in hypothalamus and hindbrain of rainbow trout. In a first experiment, trout were injected ICV with saline alone or containing increased doses of leptin (0.3-30 mu g mu l(-1)). Leptin induced in general in both hypothalamus and hindbrain dose-dependent changes in parameters related to glucosensing (increased glycogenic and glycolytic potentials together with increased GK activity, and increased mRNA levels of genes involved in glucosensing response) compatible with those occurring under hyperglycemic conditions, a situation that is known to produce anorexia. The anorectic action of leptin in our experimental conditions was observed in a second experiment. The specificity of leptin action was tested in a third experiment in which trout were injected ICV with saline, or leptin alone, or leptin plus agents known to inhibit leptin signaling pathways in mammals. The results obtained suggest that the central action of leptin on glucosensing system can be related to the JAK/STAT and IRS-PI(3) K pathways. Finally, we also provide evidence for a peripheral effect of central leptin treatment (increased liver glycogenolytic potential), which could be associated with increased sympathetic activity. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据