4.4 Article

Cloning and functional characterization of a new antimicrobial peptide gene StCT1 from the venom of the scorpion Scorpiops tibetanus

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 22-26

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.10.008

关键词

Scorpion; Venom; Antimicrobial peptides; Antibiotics-resistant

资金

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [30530140, 30570045]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007FY210800]
  3. China Specific Project for Developing New Drugs [2009ZX09103-612, 2008ZX10001-015-9]
  4. 973 programs [2010CB529800, 2005CB522903]
  5. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0745]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scorpion has an innovative venom gland, which is an important determinant in contributing to its successful survival for more than 400 million years. Scorpion venom contains a diversity of bioactive peptides, which represent a tremendous hitherto unexplored resource for use in drug design and development. Here, StCT1, a new antimicrobial peptide gene, was screened and isolated from the venomous gland cDNA library of the scorpion Scorpiops tibetanus. The full-length cDNA of StCT1 is 369 nucleotides encoding the precursor that contains a putative 24-residue signal peptide, a presumed 14-residue mature peptide, and an uncommon 37-residue acidic propeptide at the C-terminus. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the synthetic StCT1 peptide against Staphylococcus aureus and Micrococcus luteus were 12.5 mu g/ml and 100 mu g/ml, respectively. The MICs of StCT1 against clinical antibiotics-resistant bacterial strains, were 50-250 mu g/ml, 2-40 folds lower than those of penicillin. These results show that the antimicrobial peptide encoded by StCT1 gene from the venom of the scorpion S. tibetanus is a potential anti-infective polypeptide or lead compound, especially for treating antibiotics-resistant pathogens. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据