4.4 Article

Pharmacokinetics of proline-rich tripeptides in the pig

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 2196-2202

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.08.011

关键词

Absolute bioavailability; Bioactive peptides; Ile-Pro-Pro; Leu-Pro-Pro; Val-Pro-Pro; Interorgan pig model

资金

  1. SenterNovem
  2. an agency of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs [TSGE301]
  3. DSM Food Specialties, Delft, The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tripeptides may possess bioactive properties. For instance, blood pressure lowering is attributed to the proline-rich tripeptides Ile-Pro-Pro (IPP), Leu-Pro-Pro (LPP), and Val-Pro-Pro (VPP). However, little is known about their absorption, distribution, and elimination characteristics. The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic behavior of IPP, LPP, and VPP in a conscious pig model. Synthetic IPP, LPP, and VPP were administered intravenously or intragastrically (4.0 mg kg(-1) BW in saline) to 10 piglets (approximately 25 kg body weight) in the postabsorptive state. After intravenous dosing, the elimination half-life for 1PP was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than for LPP and VPP (2.5 +/- 0.1, 1.9 +/- 0.1, and 2.0 +/- 0.1 min, respectively). After intragastric dosing, however, the elimination half-lives were not significantly different between the peptides (9 +/- 1, 15 +/- 4, and 12 +/- 6 min, respectively). Maximum plasma concentrations were about 10 nmol l(-1) for the three tripeptides. The fraction dose absorbed was 0.077 +/- 0.010, 0.059 +/- 0.009, and 0.073 +/- 0.015%, for IPP, LPP, and VPP, respectively. Proline-rich tripeptides reach the blood circulation intact, with an absolute bioavailability of about 0.1% when administered via a saline solution. Because half-lives of absorption and elimination were maximally about 5 and 15 min, respectively, this suggests that under these conditions a bioactive effect of these tripeptides would be rather acute. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据