4.3 Article

The effects of earthworms on the demography of annual plant assemblages in a long-term mesocosm experiment

期刊

PEDOBIOLOGIA
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 127-132

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2010.12.001

关键词

Earthworms; Plant demography; Plant community; L. terrestris; A. caliginosa; Annual plants

资金

  1. ANR [JC05_52230]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Earthworms have been shown to influence plant growth, survival and fecundity. They can therefore affect plant demography in plant communities changing their composition. A long term mesocosm experiment was set-up to test the effects of an endogeic (Aporrectodea caliginosa) and an anecic (Lumbricus terrestris) earthworm species on assemblages of four species of annuals: one grass (Poa annua), two forbs (Veronica persica and Cerastium glomeratum) and one legume (Trifolium dubium). The number of individuals and the biomass of each species were investigated. A. caliginosa and L terrestris affected the density of T. dubium at each of the three monitored census dates. The other plant species responded to A. caliginosa and L terrestris at the second and third generations. The presences of A. caliginosa and L. terrestris reduced the total number of plant individuals from the second to the third generation. At harvest (3rd generation), T. dubium and V. persica had more and larger individuals in the presence of A. caliginosa. When both earthworm species were present, T. dubium had few but larger individuals. Our study confirms that earthworms affect plant demography and plant community structure. Our results also show that accurate prediction of long-term effects of earthworms on plant communities cannot be achieved using results on their short-term effects on plant growth. This is due to the poor understanding of the effects of earthworms on plant resource allocation and demography, and also the possibility that earthworms may exert the opposite effect on the short and long-term availability of nutrients. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据