4.0 Article

Outcomes of very-low-birthweight infants at 3 years of age born in 2003-2004 in Japan

期刊

PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 1051-1058

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2011.03480.x

关键词

cerebral palsy; neonatal intensive care unit; neurodevelopment; outcome; very-low-birthweight

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of this study was to describe and compare neurodevelopmental outcomes with birthweight (BW) groups at 250-g intervals of very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants at 3 years of age in a multicenter cohort in Japan. Methods: A total of 3104 VLBW infants born in 2003 and 2004 registered in a NICU-network database were followed in the study. Neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) was defined as any of the following impairments: cerebral palsy, unilateral or bilateral blindness, severe hearing impairment, or developmental delay; a developmental quotient (DQ) <70 measured using the Kyoto Scale of Psychological Development test or judged by physicians in infants without the test. Results: A total of 257 infants died and follow-up data were obtained from 1826 infants. Of the 1826 infants, 155 (8.5%) had cerebral palsy, 25 (1.4%) had visual impairment, and 12 (0.7%) had hearing impairment. Of the 1197 infants in whom DQ was measured, 184 (15.4%) had DQ < 70. The proportion of NDI in the evaluated infants was 19.2% (n = 350), ranging from 11.9% (BW 1251-1500 g) to 42.0% (BW <= 500 g). Odds ratios (95% CI) of NDI or death against the group BW 1251-1500 g were 20.62 (13.29-31.97) in BW <= 500 g, 7.25 (5.45-9.64) in BW 501-750 g, 2.85 (2.12-3.82) in BW 751-1000 g and 1.18 (0.85-1.64) in BW 1001-1250 g. Conclusion: The increasing proportion of NDI or death, an indicator of adverse outcome, was associated with decrement in the BW of the groups. Although we have to consider a bias due to loss of follow-up data, the incidence of NDI was similar to previous overseas cohort studies despite the higher survival proportion in our study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据