4.7 Article

Risk and Prevalence of Developmental Delay in Young Children With Congenital Heart Disease

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 133, 期 3, 页码 E570-E577

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-2309

关键词

congenital heart disease and defects; developmental follow-up; developmental outcomes; assessment and surveillance; child development

资金

  1. National Center for Research Resources
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [8UL1TR000055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk for developmental delay (DD). Changes in cognitive, language, and motor skills in early childhood have not been described. We report the results of a structured approach using longitudinal testing to identify problems and ensure early intervention in accordance with published guidelines.METHODS:Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition, were used to assess cognitive, language, and motor skills in 99 children with CHD. Subjects were evaluated 3 to 6 times in the first 3 years of life. DD was defined as scores >1 SD below the population mean.RESULTS:Cardiac anatomy was single ventricle (1V) in 34 subjects and 2 ventricles (2V) in 65. Medical comorbidities were present in 21% and genetic syndromes in 19%. Most subjects (75%) had DD in 1 area at 1 assessments. Subjects with 1V anatomy had equivalent outcomes to those with 2V. Cognitive and language scores declined in subjects with genetic syndromes but were stable and within the average range for subjects with 1V and 2V. Motor scores improved for subjects with 1V and 2V but remained low for those with genetic syndromes. In addition to age, need for supplemental tube feeding, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and shorter time since last hospitalization were significant predictors of developmental outcomes.CONCLUSIONS:DDs in young children with CHD are both common and dynamic. Providers should encourage longitudinal surveillance for children with CHD because exposure to risk and prevalence of DD change over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据