4.7 Article

Risk Factor Changes for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome After Initiation of Back-to-Sleep Campaign

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 129, 期 4, 页码 630-638

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-1419

关键词

triple-risk model; brainstem; prone sleep; bed-sharing; serotonin; maternal smoking

资金

  1. CJ Foundation for SIDS, First Candle/SIDS Alliance
  2. Southwest SIDS Research Institute
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Development [HD-20991]
  4. Office of the Medical Examiner of San Diego County, California

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the profile of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) changed after the Back-to-Sleep (BTS) campaign initiation, document prevalence and patterns of multiple risks, and determine the age profile of risk factors. METHODS: The San Diego SIDS/Sudden Unexplained Death in Childhood Research Project recorded risk factors for 568 SIDS deaths from 1991 to 2008 based upon standardized death scene investigations and autopsies. Risks were divided into intrinsic (eg, male gender) and extrinsic (eg, prone sleep). RESULTS: Between 1991-1993 and 1996-2008, the percentage of SIDS infants found prone decreased from 84.0% to 48.5% (P<.001), bed-sharing increased from 19.2% to 37.9% (P<.001), especially among infants <2 months (29.0% vs 63.8%), prematurity rate increased from 20.0% to 29.0% (P = .05), whereas symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection decreased from 46.6% to 24.8% (P<.001). Ninety-nine percent of SIDS infants had at least 1 risk factor, 57% had at least 2 extrinsic and 1 intrinsic risk factor, and only 5% had no extrinsic risk. The average number of risks per SIDS infant did not change after initiation of the BTS campaign. CONCLUSIONS: SIDS infants in the BTS era show more variation in risk factors. There was a consistently high prevalence of both intrinsic and especially extrinsic risks both before and during the Back-to-Sleep era. Risk reduction campaigns emphasizing the importance of avoiding multiple and simultaneous SIDS risks are essential to prevent SIDS, including among infants who may already be vulnerable. Pediatrics 2012;129:630-638

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据