4.7 Review

Language Functions in Preterm-Born Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 129, 期 4, 页码 745-754

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-1728

关键词

language development; long-term outcome; meta-analytic methods; premature infants; systematic reviews

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Preterm-born children (<37 weeks' gestation) have higher rates of language function problems compared with term-born children. It is unknown whether these problems decrease, deteriorate, or remain stable over time. The goal of this research was to determine the developmental course of language functions in preterm-born children from 3 to 12 years of age. METHODS: Computerized databases Embase, PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and PsycInfo were searched for studies published between January 1995 and March 2011 reporting language functions in preterm-born children. Outcome measures were simple language function assessed by using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and complex language function assessed by using the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals. Pooled effect sizes (in terms of Cohen's d) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for simple and complex language functions were calculated by using random-effects models. Meta-regression was conducted with mean difference of effect size as the outcome variable and assessment age as the explanatory variable. RESULTS: Preterm-born children scored significantly lower compared with term-born children on simple (d = -0.45 [95% CI:-0.59 to -0.30]; P < .001) and on complex (d = -0.62 [95% CI: -0.82 to -0.43]; P < .001) language function tests, even in the absence of major disabilities and independent of social economic status. For complex language function (but not for simple language function), group differences between preterm-and term-born children increased significantly from 3 to 12 years of age (slope = -0.05; P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: While growing up, preterm-born children have increasing difficulties with complex language function. Pediatrics 2012;129:745-754

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据