4.7 Article

Management of Neonates With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 129, 期 5, 页码 1006-1015

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-0541

关键词

early-onset sepsis; antimicrobial therapy; group B streptococcus; meningitis; gastric aspirate; tracheal aspirate; chorioamnionitis; sepsis screen; blood culture; lumbar puncture; urine culture; body surface cultures; white blood count; acute phase reactants; prevention strategies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With improved obstetrical management and evidence-based use of intrapartum antimicrobial therapy, early-onset neonatal sepsis is becoming less frequent. However, early-onset sepsis remains one of the most common causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality in the preterm population. The identification of neonates at risk for early-onset sepsis is frequently based on a constellation of perinatal risk factors that are neither sensitive nor specific. Furthermore, diagnostic tests for neonatal sepsis have a poor positive predictive accuracy. As a result, clinicians often treat well-appearing infants for extended periods of time, even when bacterial cultures are negative. The optimal treatment of infants with suspected early-onset sepsis is broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents (ampicillin and an aminoglycoside). Once a pathogen is identified, antimicrobial therapy should be narrowed (unless synergism is needed). Recent data suggest an association between prolonged empirical treatment of preterm infants (>= 5 days) with broad-spectrum antibiotics and higher risks of late onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and mortality. To reduce these risks, antimicrobial therapy should be discontinued at 48 hours in clinical situations in which the probability of sepsis is low. The purpose of this clinical report is to provide a practical and, when possible, evidence-based approach to the management of infants with suspected or proven early-onset sepsis. Pediatrics 2012; 129: 1006-1015

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据