4.7 Article

Effectiveness of Pentavalent Rotavirus Vaccine Against Severe Disease

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 128, 期 2, 页码 E267-E275

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3722

关键词

rotavirus; acute gastroenteritis; vaccine effectiveness; vaccine impact; RV5; population-based surveillance

资金

  1. Merck Research Laboratories, Inc
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc
  3. Novartis
  4. Wyeth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To determine the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of complete and partial vaccination with the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5) in the prevention of rotavirus acute gastroenteritis (AGE) hospitalizations and emergency department visits during the first 3 rotavirus seasons after vaccine introduction. METHODS: Active, prospective population-based surveillance for AGE and acute respiratory infection (ARIs) in inpatient and emergency department settings provided subjects for a case-control evaluation of VE in 3 US counties from January 2006 through June 2009. Children with laboratory-confirmed rotavirus AGE (cases) were matched according to date of birth and onset of illness to 2 sets of controls: children with rotavirus-negative AGE and children with ARI. The main outcome measure was VE with complete (3 doses) or partial (1 or 2 doses) RV5 vaccination. RESULTS: Of age-eligible children enrolled, 18% of cases, 54% of AGE controls, and 54% of ARI controls received >= 1 dose of RV5. The VE of RV5 for 1, 2, and 3 doses against all rotavirus genotypes with the use of rotavirus-negative AGE controls was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 37%-90%), 88% (95% CI: 66%-96%), and 87% (95% CI: 71%-94%), respectively, and with the use of ARI controls was 73% (95% CI: 43%88%), 88% (95% CI: 68%-95%), and 85% (95% CI: 72%-91%), respectively. The overall VE estimates were comparable during the first and second years of life and against AGE caused by different rotavirus strains. CONCLUSION: RV5 was highly effective in preventing severe rotavirus disease, even after a partial series, with protection persisting throughout the second year of life. Pediatrics 2011;128:e267-e275

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据