4.7 Article

Preterm Birth Alters the Maturation of Baroreflex Sensitivity in Sleeping Infants

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 129, 期 1, 页码 E89-E96

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-1504

关键词

cardiovascular control; preterm infant; sleep; sudden infant death syndrome

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [284357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: Impaired blood pressure (BP) control may underpin the increased incidence of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in preterm infants. This study aimed to examine the effects of preterm birth, postnatal age, and sleep state on BP control by measuring baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) across the first 6 months of term-corrected age (CA), when SIDS risk is greatest. METHODS: Preterm (n = 25) and term (n = 31) infants were studied longitudinally at 2 to 4 weeks, 2 to 3 months, and 5 to 6 months CA using daytime polysomnography. BP was recorded during quiet (QS) and active (AS) sleep using a photoplethysmographic cuff placed around the infant's wrist (Finometer [FMS, Finapres Medical Systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands]). BRS (milliseconds/mm Hg) was assessed in 1- to 2-minute epochs using cross-spectral analysis. RESULTS: In preterm infants, postnatal age had no significant effect on BRS within either QS or AS. This was in contrast to the maturational increase in QS observed in term infants. Compared with term infants, BRS of preterm infants was 38% higher at 2 to 4 weeks CA and 29% lower at 5 to 6 months CA during QS (P <.05). Comparing sleep states, BRS of preterm infants was 26% lower in QS compared with AS at 2 to 3 months CA (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preterm birth impairs the normal maturational increase in BRS, resulting in a substantial reduction in BRS at 5 to 6 months CA during QS. Lower BRS during QS compared with AS at 2 to 3 months CA may place preterm infants at an increased risk for cardiovascular instability at this age of peak incidence of SIDS. Pediatrics 2012; 129: e89-e96

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据