4.7 Article

Physical Activity and Electronic Media Use in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Case-Control Study

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 125, 期 6, 页码 E1364-E1371

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-1598

关键词

physical activity; diabetes mellitus; adolescents; television; obesity

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease
  3. American College of Sports Medicine Foundation
  4. American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize the physical activity (PA) and electronic media (EM) use habits of a population-based, ascertained sample of youths with diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: For this investigation, the Search for Diabetes in Youth Case-Control study (age: 10-20 y; 55% female) recruited 384 youths with provider-diagnosed type 1 DM, 90 youths with type 2 DM, and 173 healthy control subjects between 2003 and 2006, in 2 US centers. PA and EM use were assessed with a 3-day recall of activities, in 30-minute time blocks. Adherence to current recommendations was determined as a report of >= 2 blocks of moderate/vigorous PA per day and <4 blocks of EM use per day. Differences in PA and EM use for DM/control groups were assessed with adjustment for age, study site, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Male subjects with type 2 DM reported lower levels of vigorous PA than did control subjects (1.1 vs 2.3 blocks; P < .05). Compliance with the moderate/vigorous PA recommendation among youths with type 2 DM was lower (68.3%), compared with youths with type 1 DM (81.7%; odds ratio: 0.51 [95% confidence interval: 0.26-1.00]; P = .047) and control subjects (80.4%; odds ratio: 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.23-1.02]; P = .05). Rates of compliance with EM use recommendations ranged from 29.5% to 49.1%. CONCLUSION: In this study, large proportions of youths with DM, especially type 2 DM, failed to meet PA and EM use recommendations. Pediatrics 2010; 125: e1364-e1371

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据