4.7 Article

Defining the Reference Range for Oxygen Saturation for Infants After Birth

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 125, 期 6, 页码 E1340-E1347

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-1510

关键词

newborn infant; resuscitation; oximetry; oxygen saturation; delivery room

资金

  1. Royal Women's Hospital
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [384100]
  3. Medical Research Council [G0400546, G0400546B, G0700961] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0400546, G0700961] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to define reference ranges for pulse oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) values in the first 10 minutes after birth for infants who received no medical intervention in the delivery room. METHODS: Infants were eligible if a member of the research team was available to record SpO(2) immediately after birth. Infants were excluded if they received supplemental oxygen or any type of assisted ventilation. SpO(2) was measured with a sensor applied to the right hand or wrist as soon as possible after birth; data were collected every 2 seconds. RESULTS: We studied 468 infants and recorded 61 650 SpO(2) data points. The infants had a mean +/- SD gestational age of 38 +/- 4 weeks and birth weight of 2970 +/- 918 g. For all 468 infants, the 3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 97th percentile values at 1 minute were 29%, 39%, 66%, 87%, and 92%, respectively, those at 2 minutes were 34%, 46%, 73%, 91%, and 95%, and those at 5 minutes were 59%, 73%, 89%, 97%, and 98%. It took a median of 7.9 minutes (interquartile range: 5.0-10 minutes) to reach a SpO(2) value of >90%. SpO(2) values for preterm infants increased more slowly than those for term infants. We present percentile charts for all infants, term infants of >= 37 weeks, preterm infants of 32 to 36 weeks, and extremely preterm infants of <32 weeks. CONCLUSION: These data represent reference ranges for SpO(2) in the first 10 minutes after birth for preterm and term infants. Pediatrics 2010; 125: e1340-e1347

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据