4.7 Article

Geographic Maldistribution of Primary Care for Children

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 127, 期 1, 页码 19-27

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-0150

关键词

physician workforce; primary care; access to care; health policy

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  3. Health Resources and Services Administration
  4. National Institute of Aging [P01 AG019783-06]
  5. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services through the Colorado Foundation for Medical Care
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P01AG019783] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: This study examines growth in the primary care physician workforce for children and examines the geographic distribution of the workforce. METHODS: National data were used to calculate the local per-capita supply of clinically active general pediatricians and family physicians, measured at the level of primary care service areas. RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2006, the general pediatrician and family physician workforces expanded by 51% and 35%, respectively, whereas the child population increased by only 9%. The 2006 per-capita supply varied by >600% across local primary care markets. Nearly 15 million children (20% of the US child population) lived in local markets with <710 children per child physician (average of 141 child physicians per 100 000 children), whereas another 15 million lived in areas with >4400 children per child physician (average of 22 child physicians per 100 000 children). In addition, almost 1 million children lived in areas with no local child physician. Nearly all 50 states had evidence of similar extremes of physician maldistribution. CONCLUSIONS: Undirected growth of the aggregate child physician workforce has resulted in profound maldistribution of physician resources. Accountability for public funding of physician training should include efforts to develop, to use, and to evaluate policies aimed at reducing disparities in geographic access to primary care physicians for children. Pediatrics 2011;127:19-27

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据