4.7 Article

No Change in the Incidence of Ampicillin-Resistant, Neonatal, Early-Onset Sepsis Over 18 Years

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 125, 期 5, 页码 E1031-E1038

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-1573

关键词

neonatal early-onset sepsis; ampicillin-resistant sepsis; group B Streptococcus; intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [M01-RR00635-210718, M01-RR002635-225344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of maternal antibiotic exposure on neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) rates over an 18-year period. METHODS: A review was performed of infant and maternal records for all culture-proven cases of EOS in infants delivered at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA) in 1990-2007. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 335 EOS cases over periods that differed with respect to hospital policy for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis against group B Streptococcus (GBS): 1990-1992 (no prophylaxis); 1993-1996 (risk-based); and 1997-2007 (screening-based). The overall incidence of EOS decreased over these periods (3.70 vs 2.23 vs 1.59 cases per 1000 live births; P < .0001). No change in the incidence of infection with ampicillin-resistant organisms was observed overall or among very low birth weight infants. However, an increased proportion of infections were caused by ampicillin-resistant organisms. Mothers of infants with ampicillin-resistant infections were more likely to have been treated with ampicillin (P < .0001). Overall peripartum antibiotic use increased during the study period primarily because of increased use of penicillin G and clindamycin, with no significant change in the use of ampicillin. CONCLUSIONS: Predominant use of penicillin G for GBS prophylaxis resulted in decreased incidence of EOS. No change in the incidence of ampicillin-resistant EOS was observed, but resistant cases were associated with peripartum ampicillin exposure. These findings suggest that obstetricians should consider preferential use of penicillin G for GBS prophylaxis. Pediatrics 2010; 125: e1031-e1038

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据